Skip Navigation

Places that should be World Heritage Sites?

Travel Forums General Talk Places that should be World Heritage Sites?

Page
  • 1
  • 2

Last Post

11. Posted by Calcruzer (Moderator 1989 posts) 8y

Two that I would suggest that are not on the list are:

In the US:
Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, California

In Germany:
Neuschwanstein Castle near Fussen, Germany

12. Posted by opospa (Travel Guru 1836 posts) 8y

Quoting Calcruzer

In the US:
Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, California

sister to statue of poverty

13. Posted by jemster (First Time Poster 1 posts) 8y

Try this, there's fifty places here, most of them are not World Heritage but many could be.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jeremyglover/sets/72157603865167400/

If you're not familiar with Flickr just click on the images to make larger then use ALL SIZES to make big enough to read.

14. Posted by Lavafalls (Travel Guru 155 posts) 8y

I agree about Burma. Bagan is equal, if not more amazing, then Angkor Wat.

15. Posted by matthew26 (Budding Member 8 posts) 8y

I've seen a Mediterranean archeology park in Andalucia. I think it should be included as a World Heritage site since it contains so much of our history.

16. Posted by krisek (First Time Poster 1 posts) 8y

Angkor Wat is already on the List... (!). I'd suggest:

Gdansk in Poland - a 1000 years old city of culture and memory, a place where a movement was born that brought the end of communism in Europe.

Laas Geel in Somaliland - prehistoric rock art, whose quality is breathtaking

The rainforest of Ranomafana in Madagascar - home to the golden bamboo lemur, the animal does not live anywhere else on Earth

Amber Fort near Jaipur, India - impossible to describe its massive size and beauty

Posts 17 & 18 were removed by moderators
Page
  • 1
  • 2