So the message continues....
A few members have suggested that 5 days in Venice is too long. My sister went with a friend for 2 weeks! They had a good time. They just "chilled" most of the time. They would hang out somewhere and have a drink or pizza. It wasn't about seeing everything for them. I just figured that 5 days would give me time to visit the sites and just take my time going through the city. However, someone suggested going to Padova or Ferrara so that might be something that I could do.
Between Formia and Lucca there's also Maremma if you like food (but also sea and nature) you have to stop there.
I will check it out!
Why you don't want to visit Napoli or Firenze?
I mentioned the reason for Napoli above. I have been to Firenze and it's a beautiful place. I think the reason why I didn't include it as one of the cities to visit is b/c I knew that it would be a very busy place. I also didn't really think about it. I also wasn't planning on going to Rome but I got a lot of flack about that. lol. It was like saying "no" to chocolate. I see Rome as a busy place and since I have been to the Vatican (twice), seen the Sistene Chapel, Spanish steps and Trevi fountain (although it would be nice to this again and spend more time there). There's a lot of busyness and go-go-go where I live and I didn't want to be in that sort of environment.
My suggestion is to go first in the south and than in the north, as moving in France will be more easier (and also quick).
Several people have suggested this - starting in Rome and traveling south first and then north, ending in France.
Someone else suggested going to France first and then head to Italy, flying into Rome.
One more thought: Consider reversing the order of you trip, flying into Paris and out of Rome or Venice...... Only requirement for this is that you go to France first and that all the stops in Italy are in a logical north-south-north order. This sounds good too.
It would make a lot more sense to go Venice-Tuscany(incl. Cinque Terre)-Rome-Formia-Sorrento-Sicily-Scigliano-Rome-France or Rome-Formia-Sicily-Scigliano-Sorrento-Tuscany-Venice-France. Saves you travelling time and money. I don't know what to do. They are all great ideas. I need to decide soon what I will do (fly into Rome, Venice or Paris). I want to start booking my accommodations and places to visit. I will be going within a month and I don't want to rush through my preparations.
If you travel from Venice to Rome you travel through Tuscany. Cinque Terre is in Tuscany. Oh, I didn't know that Cinque Terre is in Tuscany.
I should take a bit more time at Sicily. Palermo, Cefalu, Arigento, Noto, Catania are very worthwhile and this trip will cost at least 5 or 6 days.
I didn't realize this. Originally, Sicily wasn't in my agenda either but a few members mentioned that it's wonderful there. I read so many positive reviews about it. I thought 3-4 days would be enough.
After exploring Sicily start travelling north. By bus? I took a bus from Catania up to Catanzaro (Calabria). Of course train travelling is possible too.
I thought of going to my grandmother's (Calabria) for about 5-6 days, heading to Sicily and then going back to my grandmother's for about 9-10 days. I haven't seen my grandmother in 15 years so I don't want to have a quick visit and leave. She's a wonderful and funny person. I adore her and miss her a lot so I want to spend quality time with her and my other relatives. Some people have said that 12-14 days is too long but when you leave half way around the world and haven't seen a relative in 15 years, it's not long for me. I feel this way now. It might be different when I visit but I will be breaking up the visit by going to Sicily so I figure that the days will go by.
Cinque Terra is very beautiful. There's a train passing the most beautiful villages; take a hike or two!
Thanks. I also heard that it's beautiful from other travelers. I will be sure to bring comfortable shoes for the hikes.
About France: Monte Carlo, Nice and hitting Reims when you travel to Paris.
I can't remember if I have been to Monte Carlo or Monaco. It's been a while but it was like a 30-45 minute experience. That's what happens when you travel on a tour.
Note that 5 days are a bit much for Venice, I would spent more time in Rome.
Several people have mentioned that 5 days in Venice is too long. Why do you feel that way? I have only been there once (when I was 24) but we didn't stay very long. I'm curious to know what the reasoning is for visiting Venice for less days and Sicily for a longer stay. I would appreciate your feedback.
If you end your trip in Rome or Venice consider using a budget flight to get to Paris.
I considered this. I also thought of taking the train. Which would be better (cheaper and convenient)? How long would the train ride be from Rome to Paris or vice-versa? Are the trains nice? I'm wondering if they are the European trains that I will be traveling in or typical everyday trains - like a city bus.
Question - What do you think of the time frame that I have given myself in France? I think I planned 5 days in Paris and 3-4 in Provence? I can always take Provence out. I read that it's a beautiful place and added it to the list a few days ago.
If you have more detailed questions, you know where you can find me!!
Thank you, thank you, thank you. : )
Thank you ALL for your help. It is very much appreciated!
Cheers.
P.S. I'm sorry for getting a bit personal with my story. I just wanted to let you know where I was coming from and what this trip meant to me.