Quoting Sam I Am
Okay, I'm back and ready to tackle these pesky moderators and their comments. Wait, did I just actually write that 'out loud'
What?????????? Me pesky??????? Spend a few weeks in Hurstbridge and Redang and look who comes back refreshed and fiesty!! (You're probably all "bronzed god" after all that sun too...)
Clearly this needs changing. It was actually originally going to be styled differently, but I think that slipped through the cracks of going back and forth between Pete and myself. I did want to clarify one thing though This text does not remove/replace the description in any way. The description is, and always has been, right underneath the title of the photo. Of course the length of this text might make it look like a description in those cases where there isn't a long one, or one at all. But a photo like this one shows more clearly where the description is.
That said, it's not right at the moment, so proposing these fixes:
- make it city based, rather than linking to a property. This makes more sense anyway, since the distances are way off in some cases. Big benefit being that it becomes less of an 'ad' for one property.
- re-style to make it clearer.
- perhaps move location out of the way to keep focus on content next to photo being related to photo as opposed to this.
I definitely don't mind having the connection made between the city/area where the photo was taken as I would be able to answer questions that may come my way inquiring about the city/area. Specific accommodation connections could put members at a loss if contacted. (But obviously, that was my objection originally.) If that change is made then a restyle and/or location move is neither here nor there - though both would probably be more beneficial in the long run.
Isa now leaves to go be "pesky" somewhere else...