but the really hard thing is to make sure the sound quality would be the same when recorded by different people in different scenarios. I think that would be nearly impossible to control.
I think this is where the strength of the wiki kicks in.
There are good and bad pictures under "photography", if I pick a bad one and include it in the wiki (because there is no other picture of that location uploaded at the time) somebody else can come along, edit the article and include another, better picture that was uploaded since then.
Same could be done with the soundfiles: Crappy soundfiles just won't be linked to from the wiki.
All we have to agree on is the format in which the sound should be recorded and which program(s) to use. Does anybody in the know have some recommendations?
To me it looks like the hardest will be the coding on your end: enabling people to upload sound files instead of photos, imbedding the soundfiles (and a player for the sound?) into the wiki code, making sure the soundfiles only play when you click on the word, etc.
EDIT: What is more, this feature could give some more function to the travel articles. I am no fan of photos, but I have made some sound recordings over the years. Especially from my trip to Israel I got about 60 min of tape floating around: recordings of traditional songs (my friend's grandma singing), the cries of the merchants in the markets (Grapes as sweet as your eyes lady, oranges 1 kilo 4 shekel, buy my bananas sir, very good and very cheap pineapple, etc), the constant honking of cars in Ramallah, people shooting kalashnikovs at a wedding, ... You get the drift. It would be cool if people could upload something like that to the wiki too instead of just pictures.
[ Edit: Edited on 11-Nov-2009, at 17:37 by t_maia ]